The impact of
the factory System on Women and the Family
by Friedrich Engels
Text analysis
The
given primary source „The impact of the factory System on Women and the
Family“, written in 1844 by Friedrich Engels in Manchester, is a text excerpt
from Engels’ publication “The condition of the Working-Class in England in
1844“. Commenting on the problems families and especially women faced during
the industrial revolution in England, Engels addresses the wide-spread audience
to inform about the urgent problems families of the lower-classes face and how
they are ignored by the entrepreneurs. With his extract, Engels demands a
re-thinking of the entrepreneurs in order to support the workers.
In his
excerpt F. Engels points out the misery for parents, especially for women. Even
if the family-father works, additionally most of the working-class-women must
work for a proper living-income. The children of these families are observed by
a nurse all day while their parents are working, being treated very badly. According
to Engels, the burdening of working and caring for the children is one reason
for increasing child-mortality. In his source, Engels describes the misery of
two women who face serious medical problems because of their double-challenge.
According to a registrar, many young mothers use narcotics to avoid the
children being loud which causes the death of many children. Engels sums up
that there is a great misery for the families of the working class as the
upbringing and exhausting working times for both of the parents cannot be
combined. This result in children being not socially acceptable although being
expected so. Last, he accuses the higher classes not to react on the bad
circumstances the lower-classes face.
Friedrich
Engels most likely describes the situation he faced in Manchester. Manchester
was one important part of England’s industrialization as it can be called the
„cradle of industrialization“. This is most probably the case because many industries,
especially in the textile sector, started their business in Manchester, Followed
by the extraction of raw materials, new workplaces urged the people to settle
in the cities, like Manchester. A Calvinistic attitude and work ethics as described
by Adam Smith made industrialization possible as the people struggled to work
hard in order to gain success and to become rewarded by god.
In his
primary source Engels points out the misery of families of the working class.
He explains the fact that a combination of upbringing of the children and the responsibility
for a proper living-income is nearly impossible.
During
the industrial revolution different social classes existed. In his source
Engels refers to the working class (compare source title „[...] of the working
class [...]“) which was at this moment very poor. Being mostly not
well-educated hard work and a low income resulted in an extremely low
living-standard. With pointing out „the employment of women“ (l.1), Engels
describes the fact that commonly the income being produced by the family-father
was so low that women had to work in order to earn the necessary money for
living. In fact, this resulted in children growing up with nurses which cared
for them during their parents work. The children did not face better
living-conditions but were commonly treated badly (l. 3-5). But there were even
worse conditions than being described by Engels. The poorest of the poorest
families which could hardly afford a living were not able to pay the nurses who
- of course - expected profit for their work. Children of these families either
had to work in factories or - even worse - in workhouses under very bad
conditions. Although the fact that industrialisation was only possible because
of decreasing child mortality which created more workforces due to a larger population,
still many children died. Only the reasons changed. When less medical care and
hygiene were responsible for child mortality before industrialisation, less
care for the youngest by their parents, especially by the mother, were
responsible for the mortality during industrialisation (l.5-6). Another reason
for children still dying although having better medical care and improved
hygiene was the stress mothers faced. Long working-days under bad conditions
exhausted them so much that the „use of narcotics“ (l.21) was a common practice
to „Keep the children still“ (l.21). Of course the children suffered from this.
This was another reason for child mortality. But not only the children
suffered, even their parents, especially women, did. In the source, Engels
incorporates the example of two women suffering real physical pain (l. 19f;
l.14f.).The exhausting work combined with the duty of child-care exhausted them
and caused real medical problems. All these factors of exhausting work, taking
care of the children, low income and bad living conditions caused „family
troubles“ (l.28). One can imagine that this caused further stress as the
working family had no place to recover from their hard work. The escape from
this vicious circle children were expected to turn out „goody-goody and moral“
(l. 32-33), to be well educated and socially acceptable. But without proper
care and education this was rarely possible. So, most of the descendants ended
as working-class-members like their parents, too, faced the same problems and
could not climb the ladder of the social stands. During the time, these bad
conditions and serious problems caused the people of the working-classes to
join forces. Those alliances set up strikes and demanded political engagement
to be able to change something. In the beginning they faced resistance by the
government and their employers who often fired them on the spot. But when the
alliances became stronger and formed parties being supported, for example, by
famous communists like Marx and Christian institutions and people like Adolf
Kolping or J. H. Wichern, the burgeois noticed that something had to be
changed. They improved safety, working conditions and the rights of the workers
and offered them funds and pensions. In return they demanded good workers. This
circle improved the market and led to our today’s social system.
Summing
up, Friedrich Engels criticizes the misery of many workers-class’ families
between the struggle of gaining money to make a living and taking care of their
youngest family members. He points out that this connection was mostly not possible
and resulted in a vicious circle even for the children but also for the
parents, especially the women.
In the
19th century it was common that children were used as workers in the factories.
Discussing the positive and negative sides of this labour one can imagine that
there must have been serious reasons for the population using children as
workers. For the overall profit of the companies it was necessary to combine
high profit without spending too much money. As children were very obedient and
likely to be instructed they offered a high working quality. Furthermore, their
mobility made them attractive workers. They could for example - because of
their height - crawl under machines to repair them or work with filigree
substances because of their small fingers. On the other hand, their obedience
made them unlikely to engage themselves in worker’s unions so in fact the
factory owners could pay them as much as they wanted. This resulted in very low
wages. Combining these two facts children were needed for companies in order to
generate a high income. But low wages were better than no wages. Often the
family father could not generate enough income. Compared to the given
primary-source, even women had to work to make a living. If this still was not
enough, parents sent their children to work so that they could increase the
income of the families. This was necessary in order to pay for a living. And if
the children did not receive wages they were fed and received clothing so the
parents avoided a lot of expenses. Furthermore, the parents did not have to pay
nurses or to think about how to care for the children. This reduced the stress
a lot. Even from our todays perspective we may see reasons supporting child-labour.
On one hand, the combination of low wages but high quality improved the market
and made a revolution possible. Maybe, without the child-labour a revolution
had not started and our life would be quite different. On the other hand, we
also learned from this child labour. The experiences from the revolution were
responsible for different laws abolishing child-labour. so, our generations
profit from this.
Of
course, there are various reasons against child labour. During the industrial revolution
children faced bad conditions in factories where the owners did not take care
of their safety. Furthermore pollution and exhausting work were very bad for
the children. Child-labour was less necessary than proper education. Only with
education children could get proper jobs experiencing better conditions. Even
the government noticed that so they set up different commissions. Unfortunately
these commissions were first useless as inspectors always observed good
conditions because the factory owners did not present the real working
conditions when they got to know about upcoming checks. Even if a market
consists of workers, those workers should be happy with their work in order to
gain high quality. On the other hand proper education is also necessary for the
market and the population must be educated in young age, so child labour is not
necessary for a successful market.
Today,
there are still countries that employ children. The reasons are basically the
same as during the industrial revolution. To generate higher profit, factory
owners employ children. Their parents accept this without having a choice to
make a living. The children there also face bad conditions and do not receive
proper education. With educated children, the profit for these countries’
companies could increase and would make child-labour unnecessary. But still not
all countries support this opinion.
Even
if it is hard to judge whether child-labour is necessary or not, one can say
that there are various reasons why, in the eyes of the child-employing
factories and families, child labour is necessary. The owner wants to increase
their profit and the families have no choice, which makes child-labour
necessary for them. From our point of view, this labour was very cruel, but
also necessary for a revolution in order to change the standards as they are
today. But as we already learned from the past, today child-labour is not
necessary anymore. On the contrary - proper education for children - obviously
avoided by child-labour - would improve the market for these countries, so
child-labour today should be, besides being illegal because of the violation
against basic human rights, unnecessary.
Sende den Text als PDF kostenlos an mich
| |
|
|